User:Jaseem/spellcheck: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
;Stemmer: For finding root words | ;Stemmer: For finding root words | ||
http://www.ldcil.org/up/conferences/morph/presentations/Vijay%20[Compatibility%20Mode].pdf | |||
http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~pb/papers/cicling12-stemming.pdf |
Revision as of 14:21, 6 March 2014
Malayalam Spell-checker
Problem
English dictionaries "rely on complete lists of full word forms, a requirement that cannot be met for morphologically complex languages" like Malayalam. Theoretically, In Malayalam agglutination of unlimited words can happen. Generally less than 10. Handling agglutinations and inflections in a spell-checker can be challenging.
Refer http://thottingal.in/documents/MalayalamComputingChallenges.pdf
Other Challenges
- Homophonic root words can have difference inflections
- മറക്കുക & മറയുക; പറയുക & പറക്കുക
- Same word can inflect differently in same context (not common)
- പോവുക, പോകുക
- Sandhi rules are complex.
Possible solutions
Hunspell
Hunspell has an algorithm for figuring out agglutination. Need to figure out how to use it.
Implementation in other languages
Spell Checking an Agglutinative Language: Quechua http://www.zora.uzh.ch/52921/1/ltc-106-rios.pdf Quechua, doesn't seem to have the complexity that malayalam sandhi's have. The automaton presented in the paper doesn't seem to work on malayalam.
- kachichasqa= kachi + cha +sqa
http://www.cmpe.boun.edu.tr/~akin/papers/spelling_checking_in_Turkish.pdf
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cmp-lg/9410004.pdf
- Stemmer
- For finding root words
http://www.ldcil.org/up/conferences/morph/presentations/Vijay%20[Compatibility%20Mode].pdf http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~pb/papers/cicling12-stemming.pdf